Kyle Whitmire launches Second Front


The Second Front

Former Birmingham Weekly columnist unveils political news site today

Kyle Whitmire, former Birmingham Weekly columnist, has started blogging for his own news site, The Second Front. He plans to cover political news and public policy as part of Weld, a yet-to-be launched local news site.

Kyle WhitmireHe left the Weekly in January. Also working on Weld is Glenny Brock, who departed from the newspaper in March.

Whitmire talked about his new operation via e-mail earlier today.

MOB: What is Second Front?

Whitmire: It’s a niche-specific blog covering political culture and public affairs important to Birmingham.

MOB: How does it relate to Weld?

Whitmire: Back in the day, Southern Progress used to have test kitchens. I was always kind of jealous of that. I suppose you can say it’s a sort of test kitchen where I get to cook and hopefully not make too big of a mess.

Already some tech-savvy friends have figured out what platform The Second Front is built on, so that will be out there soon. But that’s as good a hint as you’re going to get.

There’s something behind Door No. 3, but I can’t tell you what it is yet.

MOB: What can readers expect?

Whitmire: The focus of The Second Front is politics and public policy.

As a journalism model, The Second Front will follow the lead of The Daily Beast, Slate and many other new media startups. The site will have original content, both reporting and analysis. It will have a great deal of curation, links to pertinent stories from around the web. It will provide context when it can. And it will leverage social media to reach the largest possible audience in ways that are most useful to individual users. [The Second Front on Twitter / Facebook]

I’ve committed myself to waking up a 6 a.m. every day to compile the Frontlines, links to today’s most important stories. I’m not a morning person, so that’s not going to be a lot of fun.

I’m going to spend a lot of time in public meetings, sifting through public documents and nosing around other people’s business. All of this is much the same as I did at Birmingham Weekly, only I want to explore the blog as a new form. I don’t have to fit whatever I’m writing into a 1,000-word hole anymore.

MOB: Will it be free? Subscription? Ad supported? Something else?

Whitmire: I’ll have to dive deep into some jargon and minutia, but I think it’s important to understand the nature of the problems first.

The CPM [cost-per-thousand impressions] advertising model will not support local public affairs journalism.

To make matters worse, users are adopting “ad blindness.” Either they use ad-blocking plugins in their browsers, or they just ignore the ads altogether. As a consequence, online display advertising has a lousy ROI for the advertisers.

The other fallback option has been a subscription model, but subscription-based services do only one thing well: Prevent mass reader migrations away from print. It’s a good way to mitigate the problem, but it doesn’t solve the problem. What’s more, it goes to the Clay Shirky Principle: “Institutions will try to preserve the problem to which they are the solution.” If your job is to distribute news, you can’t do that by keeping it away from people.

What are the answers?

For the moment, I’ll have to neglect the specifics. Sorry, but that has to stay behind Door No. 3. I can share a few basic principles:

  • The digital marking solution should enhance the user’s experience, not disrupt it.
  • Users should be able to distinguish online marketing from other content, but the medium must not treat that message as if it’s radioactive or otherwise marginalize the sponsor.
  • Digital marketing should be clearly labeled but be treated as an equal citizen in the medium’s space.
  • Finally, digital marketing should be native to the Internet, and not simply an appropriation of print or broadcast forms, which we have now.

There is hope on the horizon in the form of geotagging and location-aware ads. Other kinds of micro-targeting will soon be practical. In the meantime, there are some low-tech methods to achieve the same ends, and I hope everyone will get to see them soon at The Second Front.

Why did you decide to do this site?

Whitmire: I love journalism and probably couldn’t do anything else. It has given me a front row seat to history.

The day Eric Robert Rudolph bombed the clinic on Southside, I got to get as close as the police would allow. The day they brought him back to Birmingham, I was there for that as well. I got to sit close enough in the courtroom that I could hear the chains between his feet and see his collarbone protruding against his skin.

I was there the day Richard Scrushy was acquitted and I was there the day he was convicted.

And then, of course, there was Langford. I got to cover Langford for one paper or another for nearly 10 years. It’s incredibly interesting work.

But it’s also very important work. I believe there is a reason the right to do what I do is codified in the First Amendment of the Constitution. Good journalism is a prerequisite for a healthy society. And that’s what troubles me.

While I’ve been a professional witness to history, I’ve also seen what’s happening to the media. When covering Rudolph or Scrushy, I had to fight and scrap with other reporters for stories. In contrast, all it took to prove Langford was not a legal resident of Birmingham was to pull his homestead exemption at the tax assessor’s office. No one else did that.

I’m proud of the work we did at the Weekly, but some of those scoops we got were just too easy. This never would have been the case were the (Birmingham) Post-Herald still alive.

I’m doing this because I love journalism and I love the adventure it allows me. But I’m also trying to save the Fourth Estate.

Compared to waking up at 6 a.m., that part should be easy.

Also:

• • •

Read more Birmingham media updates.

Have a news tip? Let us know!

Advertisements

3 responses to “Kyle Whitmire launches Second Front

  1. Kyle,
    Congrats on the new launch. I have no doubt that like anything else you involve yourself in, it will be informative, invigorating, and successful. I was sorry to hear about your leaving the Weekly (I feel better knowing that it was your choice). You are the only truly investigative reporter (at least that I recognize) that we have in Birmingham…I still read the Weekly, but it’s just not the same without your hard-hitting, in-depth journalism. I’ve always enjoyed sharing the “gallows” with you and look forward to following your new release. All the best brother…keep doing what you’re doing. I still hope other “journalists” will emulate your standard of no holds barred reporting… it’s the way true journalism works and anyone doing otherwise is just part of the problem vs. being part of the solution. Never be afraid to speak truth to power…some of us truly get it.

  2. Robert Batley

    Kyle’s statement: — ”In contrast, all it took to prove Langford was not a legal resident of Birmingham was to pull his homestead exemption at the tax assessor’s office. No one else did that.”
    I DID. But, I waited till several weeks before the election before I started blogging. I was wanting him not to have a chance to cover his residence situation before the election. I was blogging to the choir. The voters of Birmingham wanted Langford no matter what.
    After the election, the people had spoken and I knew the court would not rule against the people. The voters of Birmingham rule over Jefferson County, using their solidarity .
    . More recently, ——–
    Last year, a council person replied to my concern of a house being arsoned replied “Well, if the houses burn, we don’t have to go through the time required for the paper-work to demolish the privately owned property legally.”——–
    There is a good possibility the arsons are condoned by those in charge of providing civil order or, the lack thereof. ———
    What does it say about a city, Birmingham, when 8,000 property owners leave the City because they are unable to contend with the scavengers that Birmingham Police have not eliminated?
    HAS THE CITY CREATED A CRISIS IN ORDER TO SKIRT THE LAW, SAYING THE PROBLEM IS AN EMERGENCY BECAUSE OF THE DANGER? Is the City using the criminals to work their agenda?
    — I say the elimination of the criminal element was also an emergency, but it is easier to apprehend the property owner’s assets than those scavengers taking much more than the copper.
    Having the houses arsoned is a ploy to match the agenda of those down-town who are managing the tax payer’s money.
    They can skirt the law and confiscate private property by saying the arsoned houses are a danger, needing immediate attention, but all the UNOCCUPIED houses have not been arsoned and the City is still required to follow the law of private ownership.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s